Outsourcing

Software development engagement models compared

Which software development engagement model is right for your project? This guide compares the main models, fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team, and staff augmentation, with their pros, cons, and how to choose.

Oleksandr Lysenko
Head of QA and delivery department at Program-Ace
Published
10 min read
Software development engagement models compared

Software development engagement models define how you work with a development partner: who manages the team, how you pay, and how much control you keep. The main models are fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team, and staff augmentation. Each fits a different project type and level of certainty. This guide explains each engagement model, its pros and cons, and how to choose the right one.

Software development is one of the most popular requests businesses have. When a client comes to a software development outsourcing company, they usually encounter several options on how to cooperate with a vendor. So how to choose an engagement model for software development that will suit your business? This article will help you find an answer to this question and comprehend better the alternatives that your company has.

What is an engagement model?

In software development outsourcing, an engagement model definition stands for a framework that determines the relationship between the client and the vendor during their cooperation. Over the years, the industry has come up with a range of engagement models that have become a common standard adopted by software outsourcing vendors. Of course, every company adjusts the details of a particular model according to its capabilities and specifics, but in general, the majority of vendors use the same system of engagement models when offering their services.

Engagement models for software development services define the next aspects of vendor-client collaboration, as responsibilities, obligations, standards of execution, control, accountability, flexibility, ownership, and terms of project implementation, basically everything that establish the level of vendors’ involvement and allocate responsibility between parties.

Software development services imply a wide set of initiatives, and every company’s needs differ in terms of what gap in their internal expertise or resources they want to fill.

Therefore, it’s almost impossible to reduce software outsourcing merely to the point where a vendor just gets a confirmation of cooperation and gets to work. To ensure that a client is satisfied with the services provided and that delivered solutions are up to superior quality, vendors use engagement models. They allow for generating more value for customers, as well as clarify the cooperation conditions at the very beginning and set correct expectations of collaboration.

contact us

Different types of engagement models

The list of engagement models is pretty extensive, and this variety allows businesses to choose the most comfortable type of partnership. We gathered the most common engagement model examples to help you find the most suitable one for you.

Time & material model

Time & material is one of the most popular models you can find on the market of software development services. It is often opposed to fixed-budget contracts, which suggest that a price for software solution development is determined from the start and won’t change. In turn, the time & material model implies that a client is paying only for the work done at an hourly rate.

The time & material model will be a good fit for companies conducting long-term development projects with unclear scope and dynamic conditions. At the same time, to get a proper result, a client needs to invest their time and efforts in cooperation, engage in development planning and synchronize with a vendor for a common goal vision.

Pros of the T&M model:

Plus

enhanced flexibility and ability to implement changes to the project scope without losing money;

Plus

high level of control over the project’s progress and decision-making;

Plus

an opportunity to shape software requirements along the way and with the help of industry experts.

Cons of the T&M model:

Minus

low budget planning, as you can’t predict the final price of the solution;

Minus

high level of vendor involvement and the need for constant communication with a vendor;

Minus

unclear deadlines, as the timeline and scope aren’t definitely established.

Dedicated team (outsourcing)

A dedicated team is a model when an outsourcing company provides a specialized development team exclusively focused on your project. Within it, the selection of software developers is based on the specific requirements of the client and they are managed directly from the outsourcing company side. A client pays a monthly fee that covers compensations for the full-time team members as well as a vendor’s fee for administrative expenses.

Dedicated Team engagement model

Dedicated software development teams can include various specialists, namely front- and back-end developers, UI/UX designers, 3D artists, QA specialists, DevOps engineers, business analysts, project managers, etc. A service provider can pick up the necessary people from their pool or recruit new ones for you and supplement the team with the required expertise. In the dedicated team model, the client doesn’t recruit the necessary specialists, as this responsibility goes to the selected outsourcing partner. Your vendor might already have a talent pool they can onboard to your project, or they start hiring and interviewing potential employees on the client’s behalf.

The dedicated team model is typically suitable for long-term projects or ongoing development needs and entails the service provider taking on the responsibility of project management and all administrative issues, eliminating the need for hands-on management by the client.

Pros of the dedicated team model:

Plus

stable and predictable budgeting;

Plus

high speed of software development life cycle, as the team fully focused on your project;

Plus

high level of control over project management and progress.

Cons of the dedicated team:

Minus

prolonged project start, as the vendor might need time to staff a team accordingly to the client’s needs;

Minus

not applicable for short-term projects;

Minus

the client needs to have a detailed vision of its final software product to get the maximum value.

For example, Program-Ace has a pool of 120+ experts across a wide range of skills and competencies. This wealth of expertise enables us to create dedicated development teams that are precisely tailored to meet the unique requirements of our clients.

Outstaffing model

Outstaffing, also sometimes called staff augmentation, is the model that allows businesses to quickly expand their team with necessary specialists through cooperation with a vendor. Instead of going through the traditional hiring process, a company can sign up for an outstaffing contract with a software service provider and onboard outstaffed specialists into its in-house team.

In the outstaffing model, tech specialists work as full-time employees on a client’s project, while being employed by a vendor. The latter takes care of administrative aspects of developers’ employment, like compensations, benefits, equipment, etc., while a client only pays an agreed-upon fee. The outstaffing contract can be valid for any period and will be a great aid to companies that need to onboard specific tech experts into their team as soon as possible.

Pros of the outstaffing model:

Plus

quick scale-up or scale-down of your in-house development team;

Plus

access to a wide range of specialists with different industry and technology knowledge;

Plus

full control over the outstaffed developers’ work and an opportunity to manage them on your side.

Cons of the outstaffing model:

Minus

language and cultural barriers in case of hiring specialists from other countries;

Minus

high level of responsibility for the success of cooperation;

Minus

the challenges of remote work, namely the difference in time zones between your in-house team and outstaffed specialists.

In an outstaffing model, the client has full control over the team’s composition, roles, responsibilities, and project priorities. The outstaffed software developers are under your direct supervision, and it is your responsibility to use their skills to suit your business goals best.

Hybrid onshore-offshore model

While researching the phenomena of outsourcing, you can encounter terms like onshoring (outsourcing to a company located in the same country as a client), nearshoring (outsourcing to a company located in a neighboring country), and offshoring (outsourcing to a company located in a distant country). Every option has its upsides and downsides, but the IT industry has come up with a hybrid onshore-offshore model which minimizes the disadvantages and generates the most value.

This vendor engagement model works the next way: a service provider handles strategic tasks and management onshore, whether by posting its employees to the client’s site or from their onshore location. In this manner, a vendor helps its client to identify requirements and build a plan on how to cater to clients’ needs. Then, the development process goes to the offshore part of the vendors’ team, thereby optimizing expenses.

Pros of the hybrid onshore-offshore model:

Plus

Smooth and reliable communication with a vendor;

Plus

a perfect balance between cultural fit and cost optimization;

Plus

higher software quality and faster time-to-market.

Cons of the hybrid onshore-offshore model:

Minus

increased need for a reliable partner with strong management capabilities.

What engagement models does Program-Ace recommend?

Program-Ace strives for providing a superior customer experience and helping our clients reach their goals through custom software development. Therefore, we offer several business engagement models that allow us to cater more precisely to the unique requirements our clients have.

  • Project-based model: you have defined the requirements or scope of your project, and we provide you with a development team to implement this part of the work.

  • Dedicated team model: we assemble a team of hand-picked developers and other tech specialists who dive into your project on a high level, while you remain in control over the team’s capacity, project management, working hours, and deadlines.

  • Outstaffing model: we provide you with required tech specialists who join your in-house development team as full-fledged team members to fill the expertise gaps you have. When specialists join your in-house processes, success depends on how well you manage a staff augmentation team within your existing workflow.

Engagement Models Program-Ace

Program-Ace approach to the engagement process

As a leading custom software development company with decades of experience, we know how to establish cooperation to deliver maximal value to the client. Our wide industry and technology expertise allow us to suggest the most suitable tech stack for your project, as well as tailor the development process to the specifics of your business and your development.

Contact us to initiate a partnership and strengthen your business with the help of our technical expertise. Our managers are ready to provide you with the necessary info on the variety of engagement models we offer.

Frequently asked questions

Engagement models, answered

The main engagement models are fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team, and staff augmentation. Fixed price suits well-defined projects; time and materials fits evolving scope; a dedicated team gives you a long-term team under your direction; and staff augmentation adds individual specialists to your existing team. Each trades off control, flexibility, and predictability differently.

Fixed price sets an agreed cost and scope up front, best when requirements are clear and stable, while time and materials bills for actual effort, best when scope will evolve. Fixed price shifts risk to the vendor but resists change; time and materials is flexible but needs active management. The choice depends on how certain your requirements are.

A dedicated team is a full team assembled to work long-term on your product under your direction, while staff augmentation adds individual vetted specialists to your existing team. A dedicated team suits a whole product or workstream; augmentation suits filling specific skill gaps. Our guide to the dedicated team model covers it in depth.

Start from your certainty and control needs:

  • fixed price for a clear, stable, one-off project;
  • time and materials for evolving scope;
  • dedicated team for a long-running product;
  • staff augmentation for specific skill gaps.

Many companies combine models across a project as needs change.

Yes, and many projects do. A common path is starting with time and materials or a discovery phase, then moving to a dedicated team as the product stabilizes, or adding staff augmentation to cover a temporary skill gap. A good partner is flexible about this, since the right model often changes as a project matures. Choosing well starts with choosing the right partner.

Program-Ace offers all the main engagement models, fixed price, time and materials, dedicated teams, and staff augmentation, as part of 900+ projects since 1992. A practical first step is describing your project certainty, timeline, and how much control you want, which we use to recommend the model that fits best.

Let's Talk

Start a project with us

Tell us about the procedures you need to train and the outcomes you want to measure. We will route your inquiry to the right expert and map a custom approach.

Cyprus +357 22 056047 · USA +1 888 7016201
30+
Years on the market
900+
Projects delivered
150+
In-house experts

By sending this form you agree to our Privacy Policy. Your details are added to our CRM for further communication only. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.